There are still votes left to be counted, but The New York Times is finished counting its third-quarter numbers, and we can project a winner: The Times now, for the first time, generates more revenue from its digital subscribers than from its print subscribers. And its total count of subscriptions passed 7 million for the first time last month.
As of Sept. 30, its number of digital news subscribers was up 45.9 percent over the previous year. Even better were its “other” digital subscriptions (mostly Games and Cooking), which were up 63.6 percent. (That nomenclature is a change, by the way: What the Times has for decades called “Crosswords” is now broadened to “Games” in the company’s filings. Spelling Bee remains on the march.) Print subs, meanwhile, were down 3.9 percent.
In all, that’s a year-over-year increase of more than 2 million digital subscriptions. (It took the Times more than four years from the launch of its digital paywall to hit 2 million subscribers total. Now that’s one year’s haul.) The Times added 393,000 digital subscribers in the quarter.
Subscription revenues increased 12.6 percent to $301 million and digital-only products revenue increased 34 percent to $155.3 million, making digital readership the only source of growth for The Times this quarter. Print subscription revenue decreased 3.8 percent to $145.7 million “largely due to lower retail newsstand revenue, while revenue from our domestic home delivery subscription products grew 2.5 percent.” Advertising remains a giant mess, down 12.6 percent in digital, an astonishing 46.5 percent in print, and 30.2 percent overall.
At the same time, product development costs were up 27.9 percent compared to Q3 2019, which the Times attributes to the increase of digital product development employees in connection with its subscription strategy.
You can read the full announcement here.
New York Times now has more than 7 million subscribers. Digital subs business is growing at 34%. But ads continue to drop, both print and digital. ($nyt q3 earnings beat on top and bottom line)
Also noteworthy: there's $800mm in $$ on the balance sheet:https://t.co/8VZt2HlYnU
— Edmund Lee (@edmundlee) November 5, 2020
NYT ad sales are down. I would imagine that is going to flip in next year or so. With all those subs and all that data, should be easy to build a unique ad offering to clients. https://t.co/sH8uBZsRgH
— Jay Yarow (@jyarow) November 5, 2020
The New York Times: We STILL suck at failing. https://t.co/BCiZjOQUJv
— John Schwartz (@jswatz) November 5, 2020
The Times bet that by sustaining quality, rather than slashing staff, it could thrive. Maybe only the Times could make that formula work so well, but how I wish more newspapers had tried it. https://t.co/15N6PWiQjD
— Robert Bianco (@BiancoRobert) November 5, 2020
I think the drop in ad revenue is good. Then pressure to generate clicks for ads is lessened… I think.
…
New York Times Hits 7 Million Subscribers as Digital Revenue Rises – The New York Times https://t.co/f5JH0YMNxv pic.twitter.com/I8JVhKPJjI— Mike Harley, Goblin Herder (@obsolete29) November 5, 2020
"time" - Google News
November 06, 2020 at 01:39AM
https://ift.tt/3k0FDQc
For the first time, The New York Times' digital subscriptions generate more revenue than its print ones - Nieman Journalism Lab at Harvard
"time" - Google News
https://ift.tt/3f5iuuC
No comments:
Post a Comment